Case: 24-1245 Document: 59 Page: 1 Filed: 08/12/2025

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ BEAR MOUNTAINSIDE REALTY LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee ______________________ 2024-1245 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in No. 1:23-cv-00457-RAH, Judge Richard A. Hertling. ______________________ Decided: August 12, 2025 ______________________ LAWRENCE M. ROLNICK, Rolnick Kramer Sadighi LLP, New York, NY, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also repre- sented by JOSEPH RIEDE SPARACIO.

WILLIAM PORTER RAYEL, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Jus- tice, Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by BRIAN M. BOYNTON, PATRICIA M.

MCCARTHY, DOUGLAS K. MICKLE. ______________________ Case: 24-1245 Document: 59 Page: 2 Filed: 08/12/2025

2 BEAR MOUNTAINSIDE REALTY LLC v. US

Before PROST, REYNA, and CUNNINGHAM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Bear Mountainside Realty LLC (“Bear Mountainside”) appeals from a decision of the U.S. Court of Federal Claims granting the United States’ motion for judgment on the ad- ministrative record. Bear Mountainside Realty LLC v. United States, 168 Fed. Cl. 179 (2023). On appeal, Bear Mountainside mainly challenges the Court of Federal Claims’ determination that Bear Mountainside failed to show that the government acted based on an improper mo- tive in canceling the government’s solicitation or failed to fairly consider Bear Mountainside’s bid.

Relying largely on the Court of Federal Claims’ thor- ough and detailed analysis of the facts and law, we affirm.

AFFIRMED