Case: 25-1812 Document: 162 Page: 1 Filed: 09/02/2025

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ September 2, 2025 ERRATA ______________________ Appeal Nos. 2025-1812; 2025-1813 V.O.S. SELECTIONS, INC., PLASTIC SERVICES AND PRODUCTS, LLC, DBA GENOVA PIPE, MICROKITS, LLC, FISHUSA INC., TERRY PRECISION CYCLING LLC, Plaintiffs-Appellees V. DONALD J. TRUMP, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT, UNITED STATES, RODNEY S. SCOTT, COMMISSIONER FOR UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS COMMISSIONER OF THE UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION, JAMIESON GREER, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE, HOWARD LUTNICK, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS SECRETARY OF COMMERCE, UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION, Defendants -Appellants Case: 25-1812 Document: 162 Page: 2 Filed: 09/02/2025

2 V.O.S. SELECTIONS, INC. V. TRUMP

------------------------------------------------- STATE OF OREGON, STATE OF ARIZONA, STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF CONNECTICUT, STATE OF DELAWARE, STATE OF ILLINOIS, STATE OF MAINE, STATE OF MINNESOTA, STATE OF NEVADA, STATE OF NEW MEXICO, STATE OF NEW YORK, STATE OF VERMONT, Plaintiffs-Appellees V. PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, KRISTI NOEM, SECRETARY OF HOMELAND SECURITY, IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION, RODNEY S. SCOTT, COMMISSIONER FOR UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS COMMISSIONER FOR U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION, UNITED STATES, Defendants -Appellants ______________________ Decided: August 29, 2025 Precedential Opinion ______________________ Please make the following changes: On page 14 of the dissent, at line 19, “95-223” is changed to “95-223.”

On page 22 of the dissent, at line 23, “Spector” is changed to “Specter” On page 59 of the dissent, at line 13, “and” is deleted