Chowdhury v. United States
Chowdhury v. United States
Opinion
Case: 25-1916 Document: 10 Page: 1 Filed: 09/26/2025
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ ENAMUL HAQE CHOWDHURY, Plaintiff-Appellant v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee ______________________ 2025-1916 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in No. 1:24-cv-01545-LAS, Senior Judge Loren A. Smith. ______________________ ON MOTION ______________________ Before LOURIE, PROST, and CHEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
ORDER In response to this court’s August 7, 2025 order direct- ing the parties to show cause, the United States argues the case should be dismissed as untimely. Enamul Haqe Chowdhury has not responded to the order but moves for leave to proceed in forma pauperis.
Case: 25-1916 Document: 10 Page: 2 Filed: 09/26/2025
2 CHOWDHURY v. US
On March 25, 2025, the United States Court of Federal Claims entered judgment dismissing Mr. Chowdhury’s complaint. Mr. Chowdhury moved to reopen his case, which was denied on April 1, 2025. The Court of Federal Claims received Mr. Chowdhury’s notice of appeal on July 3, 2025, 100 days after entry of judgment and 93 days after the court denied the motion to reopen.
The timely filing of a notice of appeal from a final deci- sion by the Court of Federal Claims is a jurisdictional re- quirement that cannot be waived and is not subject to equitable tolling. Marandola v. United States, 518 F.3d 913, 914 (Fed. Cir. 2008); cf. Henderson v. Shinseki, 562 U.S. 428, 438–39 (2011). Mr. Chowdhury had 60 days to file his notice of appeal from the Court of Federal Claims’s decisions, see 28 U.S.C. §§ 2107(b), 2522; Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B); Fed. Cir. R. 1(a)(1)(C), but he failed to do so. Thus, we lack jurisdiction to review either the final judg- ment or the denial of Mr. Chowdhury’s motion to reopen and must dismiss.
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) The appeal is dismissed. (2) All pending motions are denied. (3) Each party shall bear its own costs.
FOR THE COURT
September 26, 2025 Date
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.