Rapidpulse, Inc. v. Penumbra, Inc.
Rapidpulse, Inc. v. Penumbra, Inc.
Opinion
Case: 24-1130 Document: 45 Page: 1 Filed: 10/14/2025
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ RAPIDPULSE, INC., Appellant v. PENUMBRA, INC., Appellee ______________________ 2024-1130, 2024-1131 ______________________ Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2021- 01466, IPR2022-00608. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ GABRIEL K. BELL, Latham & Watkins LLP, Washing- ton, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by ASHLEY M. FRY, QIUSHI (WILLIAM) YAO; CHARLES SANDERS, Boston, MA.
ELIOT DAMON WILLIAMS, Baker Botts LLP, Washing- ton, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by MARK ODA, JEREMY TAYLOR, San Francisco, CA. ______________________ Case: 24-1130 Document: 45 Page: 2 Filed: 10/14/2025
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (DYK, HUGHES, and STARK, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
October 14, 2025 Date
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.