Case: 25-2035 Document: 8 Page: 1 Filed: 10/28/2025

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ ADAEZE NWOSU, Plaintiff-Appellant v. HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE CO., Defendant-Appellee ______________________ 2025-2035 ______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California in No. 2:24-cv-09064-JFW- SSC, Judge John F. Walter. ______________________ ON MOTION ______________________ PER CURIAM.

ORDER Following this court’s September 12, 2025 order direct- ing the parties to address this court’s jurisdiction, Adaeze Nwosu argues against dismissal. Hewlett Packard Enter- prise Co. did not respond. We dismiss the appeal.

Ms. Nwosu filed a “Notice of Transfer of Venue/Notice of Removal” with the United States District Court for the Case: 25-2035 Document: 8 Page: 2 Filed: 10/28/2025

2 NWOSU v. HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE CO.

Central District of California, seeking to transfer a case she had filed in another federal district court involving allega- tions of fraud, antitrust violations, and unfair business practices.1 The district court struck the notice as frivolous and closed the case. Ms. Nwosu appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, which dis- missed her appeal for failure to prosecute. Ms. Nwosu then filed a letter with the district court seeking to reopen her appeal, and the court struck the filing for failing to comply with the local rules. Ms. Nwosu appeals to this court and moves for summary reversal of the district court’s and the Ninth Circuit’s decisions.

This court does not have jurisdiction over the decisions of the regional circuits, see 28 U.S.C. § 1295, and, in gen- eral, this court only has jurisdiction to review a final deci- sion in district court cases involving the patent laws, see 28 U.S.C. § 1295(a)(1); civil actions on review to the district court from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, see id. § 1295(a)(4)(C); and cases involving certain damages claims against the United States “not exceeding $10,000 in amount,” id. § 1346(a)(2), see id. § 1295(a)(2). Ms. Nwosu’s case does not fall into any of these categories, such that we dismiss her appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

Accordingly,

1 See Nwosu v. Hewlett Packard Enter. Co., No. 1:24- cv-64 (D.D.C.).

Case: 25-2035 Document: 8 Page: 3 Filed: 10/28/2025

NWOSU v. HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE CO. 3

IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) The appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. (2) Each party shall bear its own costs. (3) All pending motions are denied.

FOR THE COURT

October 28, 2025 Date