Sanzone v. MSPB
Sanzone v. MSPB
Opinion
Case: 25-1935 Document: 26 Page: 1 Filed: 12/09/2025
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
RAMONA SANZONE, Petitioner
v.
MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent ______________________
2025-1935 ______________________
Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in No. PH-0841-25-1402-I-1. ______________________
Before PROST, CHEN, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. ORDER Ramona Sanzone has filed petitions for review from an initial decision at both this court and the Merit Systems Protection Board. Because the petition at the Board was deemed timely filed and remains pending, the court di- rected the parties to show cause whether the petition to this court should be dismissed as premature. The Board says yes. Ms. Sanzone has not responded. In general, this court only has jurisdiction over “an ap- peal from a final order or final decision of the . . . Board.” Case: 25-1935 Document: 26 Page: 2 Filed: 12/09/2025
2 SANZONE v. MSPB
28 U.S.C. § 1295(a)(9). A timely petition for Board review renders the initial decision non-final. See 5 C.F.R. § 1201.113(a). Given Ms. Sanzone’s pending petition at the Board, this court currently lacks jurisdiction. After the Board issues a final decision, Ms. Sanzone may, if neces- sary, file a timely petition for this court’s review. Alterna- tively, if she wishes to forgo Board review of her petition and instead directly pursue this court’s review, she may wish to consider the Board’s withdrawal policy as identified by the Clerk of the Board in the letter accompanying the amended certified list in this case. See ECF No. 18 at 1; see also June 2022 Board Policy. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) The petition for review is dismissed. (2) Each party shall bear its own costs. FOR THE COURT
December 9, 2025 Date
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished