Sentient Sensors LLC v. Xilinx, Inc.
Opinion
Case: 25-1058 Document: 49 Page: 1 Filed: 04/10/2026
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ SENTIENT SENSORS LLC, Appellant v.
XILINX, INC., ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC., ATI TECHNOLOGIES ULC,
Appellees ______________________ 2025-1058 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2023- 00195. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ ANDREW COCHRAN, Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP, New York, NY, argued for appellant. Also represented by GERALD J. FLATTMANN, JR.
JEFFREY SHNEIDMAN, Fish & Richardson P.C., Boston, MA, argued for appellees. Also represented by KENNETH WAYNE DARBY, DAVID M. HOFFMAN, Austin, TX; JOHN A. DRAGSETH, Minneapolis, MN. ______________________ Case: 25-1058 Document: 49 Page: 2 Filed: 04/10/2026
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (CHEN, CUNNINGHAM, and STARK, Cir- cuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
April 10, 2026
Date
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.