U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, 2026

Banzragch v. Blanche

Banzragch v. Blanche
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Decided May 4, 2026
Banzragch v. Blanche

Opinion

Case: 26-1386 Document: 5 Page: 1 Filed: 05/04/2026

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ GANBOLD BANZRAGCH, Petitioner v. TODD BLANCHE, Acting Attorney General, Respondent ______________________ 2026-1386 ______________________ Petition for review of the Board of Immigration Ap- peals in No. A097-113-378. ______________________ Before LOURIE, CHEN, and STARK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

ORDER Ganbold Banzragch petitions this court to review an or- der of the Board of Immigration Appeals, but this court’s jurisdiction is limited and does not include immigration ap- peals, see 28 U.S.C. § 1295; see also Herrera-Alcala v. Gar- land, 39 F.4th 233, 241 n.2 (4th Cir. 2022) (noting same).

Rather, petitions for review of orders of the Board “shall be filed with the court of appeals for the judicial circuit in which the immigration judge completed the proceedings.” 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(2). Because, based on the limited record Case: 26-1386 Document: 5 Page: 2 Filed: 05/04/2026

2 BANZRAGCH v. BLANCHE presently before the court, Mr. Banzragch’s removal pro- ceedings appear to have occurred in California, we transfer this petition to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1631. See 28 U.S.C. § 41.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) The official caption and short caption are revised to reflect the Acting Attorney General. (2) The petition and all case filings are transferred to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1631.

FOR THE COURT

May 4, 2026 Date

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.