Flypsi, Inc. v. Google LLC
Opinion
Case: 25-1010 Document: 57 Page: 1 Filed: 05/13/2026
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ FLYPSI, INC., DBA FLYP, Appellant v. GOOGLE LLC, Appellee ______________________ 2025-1010, 2025-1011, 2025-1012, 2025-1020, 2025-1030 ______________________ Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2023- 00357, IPR2023-00358, IPR2023-00359, IPR2023-00360, IPR2023-00361. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ BENJAMIN S. RICHARDS, Winston & Strawn LLP, Wash- ington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by EIMERIC REIG-PLESSIS, San Francisco, CA.
DANIEL ZEILBERGER, Paul Hastings LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by NAVEEN MODI, JOSEPH PALYS, MICHAEL WOLFE. ______________________ Case: 25-1010 Document: 57 Page: 2 Filed: 05/13/2026
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (REYNA, MAYER, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
May 13, 2026 Date
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.