Nike, Inc. v. Lululemon Athletica Canada Inc.
Opinion
Case: 24-2074 Document: 53 Page: 1 Filed: 05/13/2026
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
______________________ NIKE, INC., Appellant v.
LULULEMON ATHLETICA CANADA INC.,
LULULEMON USA INC.,
Appellees
______________________
2024-2074 ______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2023- 00180.
______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________
AARON PATRICK BOWLING, Arnold & Porter Kaye
Scholer LLP, Chicago, IL, argued for appellant. Also rep- resented by MICHAEL JOSEPH HARRIS, CHRISTOPHER J. RENK; MICHAEL J. SEBBA, Los Angeles, CA.
BRIAN ROBERT MATSUI, Morrison & Foerster LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellees. Also represented by SETH W. LLOYD; MEHRAN ARJOMAND, ALEX S. YAP, Los Angeles, CA; KYLE W.K. MOONEY, New York, NY. Case: 24-2074 Document: 53 Page: 2 Filed: 05/13/2026
______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (DYK, STOLL, and STARK, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT May 13, 2026
Date
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.