Inneos LLC v. Opticis Co., Ltd.

Case: 25-1487 Document: 38 Page: 1 Filed: 06/10/2026

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ INNEOS LLC, Appellant v. OPTICIS CO., LTD., Appellee ______________________ 2025-1487 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2023- 01256. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ CHRISTIAN E. MAMMEN, Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP, San Francisco, CA, argued for appellant. Also repre- sented by JULIE GIARDINA, BARRY J. HERMAN, Baltimore, MD. MICHAEL JONES, Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, PC, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by MARTIN MOSS ZOLTICK. ______________________ Case: 25-1487 Document: 38 Page: 2 Filed: 06/10/2026

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (DYK, MAYER, and PROST, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

June 10, 2026 Date