Inneos LLC v. Opticis Co., Ltd.
Opinion
Case: 25-1487 Document: 38 Page: 1 Filed: 06/10/2026
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
______________________ INNEOS LLC, Appellant v. OPTICIS CO., LTD., Appellee ______________________ 2025-1487 ______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2023- 01256.
______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________
CHRISTIAN E. MAMMEN, Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP, San Francisco, CA, argued for appellant. Also repre- sented by JULIE GIARDINA, BARRY J. HERMAN, Baltimore, MD. MICHAEL JONES, Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, PC, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by MARTIN MOSS ZOLTICK.
______________________
Case: 25-1487 Document: 38 Page: 2 Filed: 06/10/2026 THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (DYK, MAYER, and PROST, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT June 10, 2026
Date
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.