In re NIZNICK
Opinion
Case: 25-1718 Document: 38 Page: 1 Filed: 07/14/2026
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
______________________ IN RE GERALD A. NIZNICK, Appellant ______________________ 2025-1718 ______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 18/597,761.
______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________
PATRICK BRIGHT, Wagner, Anderson & Bright, PC, Los Angeles, CA, argued for appellant.
ARTHUR JOHN ARGALL, III, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee John A. Squires. Also represented by SARAH E. CRAVEN, MICHAEL S. FORMAN, ROBERT J. MCMANUS.
______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
Case: 25-1718 Document: 38 Page: 2 Filed: 07/14/2026
PER CURIAM (REYNA, HUGHES, and STOLL, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT July 14, 2026
Date
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.