On24, Inc. v. webinar.net, Inc.
Opinion
Case: 25-1633 Document: 39 Page: 1 Filed: 07/30/2026
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
______________________ ON24, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant v.
WEBINAR.NET, INC.,
Defendant-Cross-Appellant ______________________ 2025-1633, 2025-1717 ______________________
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in No. 3:21-cv-07721-EMC, Judge Edward M. Chen.
______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________
NAGENDRA SETTY, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sulli- van, LLP, Seattle, WA, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by ALEX V. CHACHKES, Chachkes Law PLLC, Brooklyn, NY.
STEPHEN HEALY, Law Office of Stephen Healy, Peta- luma, CA, argued for defendant-cross-appellant. Also rep- resented by SEAN D. HEALY, CLAYTON MULLALY.
______________________
Case: 25-1633 Document: 39 Page: 2 Filed: 07/30/2026 THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (LOURIE, PROST, and STARK, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT July 30, 2026
Date
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.