Wipqtus, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
Opinion
Case: 25-1596 Document: 47 Page: 1 Filed: 09/11/2026
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ WIPQTUS, INC.,
Appellant v.
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., Appellee ______________________
2025-1596 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2024- 00023. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ BRIAN ANDREW CARPENTER, Cole Schotz P.C., Dallas, TX, argued for appellant. Also represented by TIMOTHY J.H. CRADDOCK, GARY SORDEN.
TRENTON A. WARD, Greenberg Traurig LLP, Atlanta, GA, argued for appellee. Also represented by JULIE PAMELA BOOKBINDER, THOMAS PEASE, New York, NY; ANDREW RYAN SOMMER, McLean, VA. ______________________ Case: 25-1596 Document: 47 Page: 2 Filed: 09/11/2026
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (TARANTO, HUGHES, and CUNNINGHAM, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
September 11, 2026
Date
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.