United States Court of Veteran Appeals, 2004

Robin E. Helmer v. Anthony J. Principi

Robin E. Helmer v. Anthony J. Principi
United States Court of Veteran Appeals · Decided February 25, 2004 · Kramer, Farley, Steinberg
17 Vet. App. 453; 2004 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 84; 2004 WL 350431
Robin E. Helmer v. Anthony J. Principi

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On November 13, 2003, the Court vacated the April 18, 2002, Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision that denied service connection for the cause of the veteran’s death and remanded the matter for readjudication. On December 4, 2003, the appellant, through counsel, filed a timely motion for a panel decision. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the parties’ prior pleadings, and the record on appeal, it is

ORDERED that the appellant’s motion for a panel decision is denied.

Concurring Opinion

STEINBERG, Judge,

concurring:

I voted to deny the appellant’s motion for a panel decision. I agree with the appellant that it would be preferable for the Court in the instant appeal to address the question of law presented by the appellant as to whether cancer in the larynx that metastasized from a cancer not listed as presumptively service connected in 38 C.F.R. § 3.309(e) (2003), adopted pursuant to 38 U.S.C. § 1116(b), is a presumptively service-connected disease under that regulation, taking into consideration 38 U.S.C. §§ 1113, 1116(a)(1) and 38 C.F.R. § 3.307(d) (2003); cf. VA Gen. Coun. Prec. 18-97 (May 2, 1997). See Mahl v. Principi, 15 Vet.App. 37, 40-47 (per curiam order) (2001) (Steinberg, J., dissenting). Nonetheless, I believe that the decision in the Court’s dispositive order in the instant case that the BVA should address that question of law, with an adequate statement of reasons or bases under 38 U.S.C. § 7104(a), (d)(1), before the Court undertakes to do so is a reasonable one under the circumstances of this case and does not warrant the intervention of a panel.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.