Grant v. United States
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- Caltex (Philippines), Inc. v. United States (Court of Claims 1951)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
dissenting :
By the provision of the Constitution the petitioner is entitled to a compensation for his property taken for public use. What is to be paid for is the loss to him, and not the benefit to the United States ; and the measure of compensation is the value of the property at the time and place it was taken.
But, before it was taken, circumstances had reduced the value of the petitioner’s property by making it utterly unavailable to him. He could neither sell it nor use it, nor carry it away, nor keep it there; he
The evidence suggests that some of the property of the petitioner might have been removed in his wagons, which the United States took and paid him for. But as, in such case, the property would have been abandoned or destroyed by the United States when the wagons and their contents were destroyed, at the time of the flight into the mountains, it is not considered to alter the question.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.