Dozier v. United States
Opinion of the Court
delivered the opinion of the court:
1. The ground taken in the first conclusion of law needs no enlargement. The decisions of the Supreme Court in cases involving the same question leave no room for questioning the conclusive force of a receipt given by a party in full for a claim where he has knowledge of all the facts and receives the money without protest or demur.
2. The second conclusion seems equally plain. The claimants were not entitled to double compensation for the injury done to their boat by accident of the 29th of July. The boat was fully insured, and they resorted to the insurers for compensation for that injury, and obtained it. That is all they had a right to, and they cannot exact from the Government remuneration on that account.
3. As to the third point, it seems to us but simple justice that, when the Government b.y military force takes a vessel from the possession of her owners and places her in the Gov-
Judgment will, therefore, be rendered in favor of the claimants for $1,445, being for seventeen days’ detention of the Isabella on the docks, at $85 per day.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.