Court of Claims, 1887

Collier v. United States

Collier v. United States
Court of Claims · Decided March 14, 1887
22 Ct. Cl. 125; 1887 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 54; 1800 WL 1663

Counsel

Mr. John Paul Jones and Mr. Robert B. Lines for the claimant:, Mr. Heber J. May (with whom was Mr. Assistant Attorney-General Howard) for the defendants:

Collier v. United States

Opinion of the Court

Per curiam :

The court is of the opinion that the service which the claimant rendered having been one which could not have been legally required of him either by the Secretary of the Treasury or the Commissioner of Agriculture, and having been rendered with the knowledge and consent of his superior officer, and for a Department having no official control of him and to which he owed no service whatever, and the employment moreover being within the iegal discretion of the Secretary of the Treasury and for the benefit of the Government, the case is necessarily ruled by the decisions of the Supreme Court in the cases of The Converse v. United States (21 How., 463), The United States v. Brindle (110 U. S. R., 688), and The United States v. Saunders (120 id., 126).

The judgment of the courtis that the claimant recover of the defendants the sum of $5,000.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.