Crary v. United States
Opinion of the Court
Before purchasing the sheep, for the slaughter of which this claim is made, the claimants and their agent appear to have exercised due care and caution in examining them; and finding the sheep free from scabies, to which the owner also certified, they purchased the sheep and paid therefor a reasonable price.
The transaction bears the marks of good faith on the part of the claimants; and while the sheep were permitted by the customs officer at El Paso to be imported into the United States without first being inspected in Mexico, the Government, through its collector of customs at that port, thereafter inspected and counted the sheep and collected thereon the import duty.
Under said section of the act the Secretary of Agriculture was not only authorized to cause the sheep to be slaughtered as he did, but the act made it his duty to ascertain the value of sheep so exposed but not infected, either by agreement between himself and the owners, if practicable, or by two persons familiar with the character and value of sheep, to be appointed by the Secretary, whose decision, if they agree, the act provides “ shall be final, * * * and the amount of the value thus ascertained shall be paid to the owner thereof out of money in the Treasury appropriated for the use of the Bureau of Animal Industry.”
The latter course, i. e., to ascertain the value, was pursued, and the sheep so exposed, but not infected, were appraised at $1 per head, and that, plus the duty, $836, amounting in all to $3,919, measures the liability of the Government for which judgment is ordered.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.