Court of Claims, 1914

Andrews v. United States

Andrews v. United States
Court of Claims · Decided March 16, 1914
49 Ct. Cl. 391; 1914 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 186; 1914 WL 1425

Counsel

Mr. George A. Kmg for the plaintiff. King & King were on the brief., Mr. George M. Anderson, with whom was Mr. Assistant Attorney General Huston Thompson for the defendants.

Andrews v. United States

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam :

This case was reported in 47 C. Cls., 51, wherein the petition was dismissed, and the claimant now makes a motion for a new trial upon the ground of error of law.

The facts are undisputed, and as they briefly appear in the foregoing findings it is unnecessary to restate them here. It is only necessary to say that upon further and more mature consideration of the legal question involved we have come to the conclusion that an error was committed by the court upon the former trial, and that judgment should have been rendered in favor of the claimant. Glavey v. United States, 187 U. S., 595; Whiting v. United States, 35 C. Cls., 291, 301; Dyer v. United States, 20 C. Cls., 166.

The claimant’s motion for a new trial will be allowed and judgment now entered in his favor in the sum of $325, and it is so ordered.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.