Court of Claims, 1923

St. Louis, Kennett & Southeastern Railroad v. United States

Court of Claims · Decided April 30, 1923

58 Ct. Cl. 339; 1923 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 325

Counsel

Mr. Sidney F. Andrews, with whom was Mr. Assistant Attorney Generad Robert H. Lovett, for the demurrer. Messrs. Dwight E. Rorer and A. A. McLaughlin were on the briefs., Mr. S. S. AsKbaugh opposed. Mr. G. B. Webster was on the briefs.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Missouri Southern Railroad v. United States (Court of Claims 1928)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

*340MEMORANDUM

BV THE COURT.

The court’s conclusion is based upon the considerations:

(1) That the jurisdiction of the Court of Claims in cases such as this is conferred by section 3 of the Federal control *341act, 40 Stat. 451. It provides for action by a board of referees and authorizes an agreement by the President with the carrier, and “ failing such agreement ” suit may be brought to determine the amount of just compensation. In the suit thus authorized the report of the referees is prima, facie evidence of the amount of compensation and of the facts stated therein. The facts averred in the petition fail to show that the condition precedent contemplated by the statute has been complied with so as to bring the case within the jurisdiction of this court.

(2) That if the court have jurisdiction the agreement, Exhibit A to the petition, concludes any rights the plaintiff might otherwise have.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.