Court of Claims, 1924

Nixon v. United States

Court of Claims · Decided May 12, 1924

59 Ct. Cl. 684; 1924 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 415; 1924 WL 2415

Counsel

Mr. John A. L. Campbell and Taylor, Oashey <& Moore for the plaintiff., Messrs. Barrett F. Brown and William F. Norris, with whom was Mr. Assistant Attorney General Robert H. Lovett, for the defendant.

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Roettinger v. United States (Court of Claims 1927)
Ferguson v. United States (Court of Claims 1925)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

*685memorandum by the court

The petition does not show a contract, express or implied, in accordance with the requirements of the Dent Act, 40 Stat., 1272. This act authorizes compensation for expenditures made upon the faith of an “ agreement, express or implied,” entered into by a plaintiff with an officer or agent acting under the authority of the Secretary of War or the President, and acting within the scope of his authority when such an agreement was not executed in the manner provided by law. See Baltimore & Ohio R. R. Co. Case, 261 U. S. 592, 596. The implied agreement contemplated by the Dent Act must be an actual agreement; that is, an agreement “ implied in fact,” founded .upon a meeting of the minds. See Baltimore & Ohio R. R. Co. Case, supra (p. 597) and also Baltimore c& Ohio R. R. Co. Case, 261 U. S. 385, 386.

The petition is dismissed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.