Court of Claims, 1929

Chinnis v. United States

Chinnis v. United States
Court of Claims · Decided March 11, 1929
67 Ct. Cl. 262; 1929 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 391; 1929 WL 2626

Counsel

Mr. S. T. AnseTl for the plaintiff., Messrs. Frank J. Keating and M. G. Masterson, with whom was Mr. Assistant Attorney- General Herman J. Galloway,, for the defendant.

Chinnis v. United States

Opinion of the Court

*267MEMORANDUM BT THE COURT

The act of June 10, 1922, 42 Stat. 627, provides:

“ * * * Commissioned warrant officers on the active list with creditable records shall, after six years’ commissioned service, receive the pay of the second period, and after twelve years’ commissioned service, receive the pay of the third period; Provided, That a commissioned warrant officer promoted from the grade of warrant officer shall suffer no reduction of pay by reason of such promotion. * * * ” (Our italics.)

Plaintiff had only four years, three months, and twenty-one days commissioned service, and was therefore not entitled to receive pay of the second period.

This same question was decided by this court April 20, 1925, in the case of John T. Alexander v. United States, and the petition was dismissed upon a conclusion of law without opinion, 60 C. Cls. 1032.

The petition will be dismissed, and it is so adjudged and ordered.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.