Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Court of Claims, 1931

Whitlock Coil Pipe Co. v. United States

Whitlock Coil Pipe Co. v. United States
Court of Claims · Decided April 6, 1931
71 Ct. Cl. 759; 1931 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 358; 1931 WL 2413

Counsel

Mr. Benedict M. Holden for the plaintiff., Messrs. J. Robert Anderson and George Dyson, with whom was Mr. Assistant Attorney General Charles B. Rugg, for the defendant.

Whitlock Coil Pipe Co. v. United States

Opinion of the Court

*761MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT

This case was submitted upon the record and the only defense interposed by the defendant was that the appropriation for the payment of the cost of the equipment furnished under the contract mentioned in the findings had *762lapsed. This, however, is no bar to the right of the plaintiff to judgment in this court for the amount due. Huffman v. United States, 17 C. Cls. 55; Dougherty v. United States, 18 C. Cls. 496; Ferris v. United States, 27 C. Cls. 542; Cogswell v. United States, 68 C. Cls. 694.

Judgment will, therefore, be entered in favor of the plaintiff for $11,315. It is so ordered.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.