Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Court of Claims, 1932

Pine Hill Crystal Spring Water Co. v. United States

Pine Hill Crystal Spring Water Co. v. United States
Court of Claims · Decided May 2, 1932
58 F.2d 506 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Harry S. Hall, of New York City, for plaintiff., Joseph H. Sheppard, of Washington, D. C., and Charles B. Rugg, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the United States.

Pine Hill Crystal Spring Water Co. v. United States

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

This case turns upon the question as to whether the plaintiff filed in time a proper claim for refund. Plaintiff contends that the letter of January 31, 1923 (finding 4), is a sufficient and legal refund claim. This issue was involved in the case of Philipsborn v. United States, 53 F. (2d) 133, 72 Ct. Cl. 545, and we think that the plaintiff’s case comes within that decision. See, also, Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Co. v. United States, 260 U. S. 565, 43 S. Ct. 169, 67 L. Ed. 406.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.