Court of Claims, 1932

Stickney v. United States

Court of Claims · Decided February 8, 1932

73 Ct. Cl. 697; 1932 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 505; 1932 WL 2197

Counsel

Messrs. George A. King and John W. Gaskins for the plaintiff. King ds King were on the brief., Mr. Louis B. Mehlinger, with, whom was Mr. Assistant Attorney General Charles B. Rugg, for the defendant.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Capps v. United States (Court of Claims 1936)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

*699MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT

This action is in all respects similar to the case of Rodman v. United States, 70 C. Cls. 751, in which this court held that a retired naval officer of the grade of rear admiral at the time of retirement when recalled to active duty is entitled to active duty pay, as provided by the act of August 29, 1916, 39 Stat. 581.

This plaintiff, as in the case cited, was recalled to active duty and served from May 5, 1925, to March 12, 1926, when he reverted to his retired status, and is therefore entitled to the difference between retired pay and the active duty pay-

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.