Court of Claims, 1934

Semmes v. United States

Court of Claims · Decided March 5, 1934 · Booth, Green, Littleton, Whaley, Williams

6 F. Supp. 119 (Federal Supplement)

Counsel

John A. Sweeney, of Washington, D. C. (Fred A. Woodis, of Washington, D. C., on the brief), for plaintiff., George H. Foster and Elizabeth B. Davis, both of Washington, D. C., and Frank J. Wideman, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the United States.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Upon the foregoing special findings of fact, whieh are made part of the judgment herein, the court decides as a conclusion of law that the plaintiff is not entitled to recover and the petition is therefore dismissed. Judgment is rendered against the plaintiff in favor of the United States for the cost of printing the record herein, the amount thereof to be ascertained by the clerk and collected by him according to law.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.