Court of Claims, 1937

De Ways-Ruart v. United States

De Ways-Ruart v. United States
Court of Claims · Decided April 5, 1937 · Booth, Green, Littleton, Whaley, Williams
18 F. Supp. 858; 84 Ct. Cl. 631 (Federal Supplement)

Counsel

Frederick O. Graves, of Washington, D. C. (Miller & Chevalier, of Washington, D. C., on the briefs), for plaintiff., Guy Patten, of Washington, D. C., and James W. Morris, Asst. Atty. Gen. (Robert H. Jackson, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Robert N. Anderson and Fred K. Dyar, both of Washington, D. C., on the briefs), for the United States.

De Ways-Ruart v. United States

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The essential facts in this case for all practical purposes are similar to the facts involved in the case of McMillan, Trustee, v. United States (Ct.Cl.) 18 F.Supp. 853, this day decided by the court. The issues and the questions of law involved are precisely the same. Under the decision in the McMillan Case the plaintiff is not entitled to recover. The petition is therefore dismissed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.