Skip to the main content
Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /United States /Cases /Court of Claims /

1939

109 Court of Claims opinions from 1939.

  • Berliner Handels-Gesellschaft v. United States 30 F. Supp. 490, (1939)
  • Lehigh Portland Cement Co. v. United States 30 F. Supp. 217, (1939)
  • Bailey v. United States 30 F. Supp. 184, (1939)
  • Champion Rivet Co. v. United States 30 F. Supp. 234, (1939)
  • Dunnington v. United States 30 F. Supp. 236, (1939)
  • B. F. Sturtevant Co. v. United States 90 Ct. Cl. 93, (1939)
  • Abrahms v. United States 90 Ct. Cl. 107, (1939)
  • A. P. Williams Iron & Bronze Co. v. United States 90 Ct. Cl. 111, (1939)
  • Robinson v. United States 90 Ct. Cl. 115, (1939)
  • Twin Cities Properties, Inc. v. United States 90 Ct. Cl. 119, (1939)
  • Wilson & Co. v. United States 30 F. Supp. 672, (1939)
  • New River Co. v. United States 30 F. Supp. 239, (1939)
  • Kernochan v. United States 29 F. Supp. 860, (1939)
  • Wood v. United States 29 F. Supp. 853, (1939)
  • Harris Trust & Savings Bank v. United States 29 F. Supp. 876, (1939)
  • Triest & Earle, Inc. v. United States 89 Ct. Cl. 5, (1939)
  • Caddo Band of Indians v. United States 89 Ct. Cl. 378, (1939)
  • American Maize Products Co. v. United States 29 F. Supp. 867, (1939)
  • Southern Pacific Co. v. United States 89 Ct. Cl. 434, (1939)
  • British American Tobacco Co. v. United States 89 Ct. Cl. 438, (1939)
  • Virginia Engineering Co. v. United States 89 Ct. Cl. 457, (1939)
  • Councilor v. United States 89 Ct. Cl. 473, (1939)
  • Park Club v. United States 29 F. Supp. 872, (1939)
  • Taylor v. United States 89 Ct. Cl. 490, (1939)
  • Louisville Bridge Commission v. United States 89 Ct. Cl. 493, (1939)
  • Commings v. United States 89 Ct. Cl. 498, (1939)
  • Dene v. United States 89 Ct. Cl. 502, (1939)
  • Dickerson v. United States 89 Ct. Cl. 520, (1939)
  • Duffy Bros. v. United States 89 Ct. Cl. 528, (1939)
  • Campbell v. United States 89 Ct. Cl. 529, (1939)
  • Young-Fehlhaber Pile Co. v. United States 90 Ct. Cl. 4, (1939)
  • Ismert-Hincke Milling Co. v. United States 90 Ct. Cl. 27, (1939)
  • Morrell v. United States 29 F. Supp. 981, (1939)
  • Cherry v. United States 89 Ct. Cl. 318, (1939)
  • Bennett v. United States 89 Ct. Cl. 322, (1939)
  • Brownstein-Louis Co. v. United States 90 Ct. Cl. 1, (1939)
  • Joplin v. United States 89 Ct. Cl. 345, (1939)
  • Rio Cape Line, Ltd. v. United States 89 Ct. Cl. 307, (1939)
  • International Milling Co. v. United States 27 F. Supp. 592, (1939)
  • Bailey v. United States 27 F. Supp. 617, (1939)
  • Beggs v. United States 27 F. Supp. 599, (1939)
  • Sioux Tribe of Indians v. United States 89 Ct. Cl. 31, (1939)
  • Bohemian Breweries, Inc. v. United States 27 F. Supp. 588, (1939)
  • Blue Jay Lumber Co. Sv. United States 27 F. Supp. 707, (1939)
  • Francis v. United States 89 Ct. Cl. 78, (1939)
  • G. Schwartz & Co. v. United States 89 Ct. Cl. 82, (1939)
  • James McHugh Sons, Inc. v. United States 89 Ct. Cl. 94, (1939)
  • Hampton & Beanchville Railroad v. United States 89 Ct. Cl. 117, (1939)
  • H. Herfurth, Jr., Inc. v. United States 89 Ct. Cl. 122, (1939)
  • Identification Devices, Inc. v. United States 89 Ct. Cl. 141, (1939)
« Prev 1 2 3 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑