Court of Claims, 1940

Dierking v. United States

Court of Claims · Decided November 12, 1940

92 Ct. Cl. 141; 1940 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 9; 1940 WL 4006

Counsel

Ansell, Ansell <& Mairshall for the plaintiff., Miss Stella Ahin, with whom was Mr. Assistant Attorney General Franeis M. Shea, for the defendant.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Shull v. United States (Court of Claims 1981)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

*144The court decided that the plaintiff was entitled to recover, in an opinion per ewriam, as follows:

.The plaintiff is clearly entitled to recover, as we have heretofore held in several different cases. Franz J. Jonitz v. The United States, 89 C. Cls. 155; Lyle M. Shields v. The United States, 90 C. Cls. 675; Charles D. McColl v. The United States, 90 C. Cls. 676; and Orville Jackson v. The United States, 90 C. Cls. 526.

On authority of those cases judgment will be entered for the plaintiff in the sum of $240.00. It is so ordered.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.