Court of Claims, 1943

Pollen v. United States

Court of Claims · Decided October 4, 1943 · Whaley, Littleton, Whitaker, Jones, Madden

58 F. Supp. 653 (Federal Supplement)

Counsel

Joseph Dugan, of Los Angeles, Cal. (John V. Lizars, of New York City, on the brief), for plaintiffs., J. F. Mothershead, of Washington, D. C., and Francis M. Shea, Asst. Atty. Gen. (Victor D. Borst, of New York City, on the brief), for defendant.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The evidence submitted by plaintiffs is not sufficient to show what range-keeper devices were either manufactured for or used by the United States within the period beginning six years prior to filing of the original petition and July 10, 1934, the expiration date of the latest patent in suit (findings 12 and 14), and no findings on validity or infringement can be made. The petition must, therefore, be dismissed. It is so ordered.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.