Court of Claims, 1943

Mogan v. United States

Court of Claims · Decided April 5, 1943

100 Ct. Cl. 393; 1943 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 71; 1943 WL 4290

Counsel

Mr. Mahlon 0. Master son, for the plaintiff. Ansell, An-sell <& Marshall were on the brief. „, Mr. Louis R. MehUnger, with whom was Mr. Assistant Attorney General Francis M. Shea, for the defendant.

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Meyer v. United States (Court of Claims 1962)
Russell v. United States (Court of Claims 1946)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

*395The court decided, in an opinion per curiam, as follows, that the plaintiff was entitled to recover:

The facts in this case are not in dispute. Plaintiff’s mother is in fact dependent upon him for her chief support. Plaintiff is entitled to recover rental and subsistence allowances due an officer of his rank and length of service, with a dependent, from October 8, 1940. Entry of judgment will be suspended pending the filing of a report by the General Accounting Office showing the amount due under the foregoing findings and in accordance with this opinion. Donald K. Mumma v. United States, decided February 1, 1943, 99 C. Cls. 261.

In accordance with the above opinion and upon a report from the General Accounting Office showing the amount due thereunder to be $3,017.53, judgment for the plaintiff was entered February 7, 1944, in the sum of $3,017.53.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.