Court of Claims, 1948

Beuttas v. United States

Beuttas v. United States
Court of Claims · Decided June 1, 1948 · Howell
77 F. Supp. 937; 111 Ct. Cl. 551 (Federal Supplement)

Counsel

P. J. J. Nicolaides, of Washington, D. C. (William F. Kelly, of Washington, D. C., on the brief), for plaintiffs., Francis X. Daly, of Boston, Mass., and Herbert A. Bergson, Acting Ass’t. Atty. Gen., for defendant.

Beuttas v. United States

Opinion of the Court

HOWELL, Judge.

The facts and circumstances in these two cases are identical with those in the case of Beuttas v. United States, Ct.CL, 77 F. Supp. 933, with the exception of the date of execution of the contracts, the location of the particular projects, and the amount of additional costs sought to be recovered.

What we have said with reference to the above case applies equally to these two cases and accordingly, the defendant’s demurrer in each case is overruled.

It is so ordered.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.