Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Court of Claims, 1949

Teichner v. United States

Teichner v. United States
Court of Claims · Decided December 5, 1949
116 Ct. Cl. 869; 1949 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 12; 1949 WL 4920

Counsel

Mr. Robert M. Drysdale for the plaintiffs., Mr. Benton G. Tolley, Jr., with whom was Mr. Acting, Assistant Attorney General Newell A. Glapp, for the defendant.

Teichner v. United States

Opinion of the Court

*873The court decided that the plaintiffs were entitled to re-

cover in an opinion

per curiam

as follows:

These cases present the same legal questions which were before this court in the cases of Thomas C. Gibney v. The *874United States No. 48572; Joseph M. Ahearn v. The United States, No. 48610; and Donald M. Taylor v. The United States, No. 48611, all decided June 6, 1949 [114 C. Cls. 38, 65, 59]. The plaintiffs are, therefore, entitled to recover for the reasons given in those cases. Entry of judgments will be suspended to await the filing of a stipulation showing the amounts to which the plaintiffs are entitled.

In accordance with the above opinion, on July 10, 1950, judgments were entered as follows:

No. 48577, Stephen J. Teichner_$265.07
No. 48629, Paul G. Maki-$880. 24

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.