Court of Claims, 1950

Penner Installation Corp. v. United States

Penner Installation Corp. v. United States
Court of Claims · Decided April 3, 1950
116 Ct. Cl. 568; 89 F. Supp. 321; 1950 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 100

Counsel

Mr. Albert Foreman for the plaintiff. Messrs. M. Carl Levine, Morgulas <& Foreman were on the brief., Mr. John R. Franklin, with whom was Mr. Assistant Attorney General H. G. Morison, for the defendant.

Penner Installation Corp. v. United States

Opinion of the Court

*569OPINION PER CURIAM

Per Curiam:

The motion for a new trial in this case is allowed, the conclusion of law and judgment [114 C. Cls. 585] heretofore entered is withdrawn, and plaintiff’s petition will be dismissed, inasmuch as there is no showing in this case that the contracting officer and head of the department acted arbitrarily, capricously, or that his decision was so grossly erroneous as to imply bad faith. It is so ordered.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.