Court of Claims, 1952

Pennsylvania Railroad v. United States

Court of Claims · Decided November 4, 1952

123 Ct. Cl. 529; 1952 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 64; 1952 WL 5927

Counsel

In No. 52-52 for plaintiff Mr. Hugh B. Cox., For defendant Mr. John I. Heise, Jr., with whom was Mr. Assistant Attorney General Holmes Baldridge., In No. 198-52 for plaintiff Mr. Richard A. Whiting. Messrs. Stephen Ailes, William E. Miller, and Sieptoe <%¡ Johnson were on the brief., For defendant Mr. Paris T. Houston, with whom was Mr. Assistant Attorney General Holmes Baldrigde.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. (Court of Claims 1953)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam :

The pleadings and the issue here presented are identical with those in the case of Atchison, Topeka and Sarita Fe Railway Company v. United States, 121 C. Cls. 467. For the reasons therein stated plaintiffs’ motions for summary judgment, to the extent that they ask for an adjudication that the jeeps involved in this action should be classified and rated as passenger motor vehicles, are granted.

Entry of judgment is suspended pending the filing of a report by the General Accounting Office and the disposition of the issues relating to the proper amount to be paid to plaintiff for the transportation services involved.

It is so ordered.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.