Court of Claims, 1953

Union Pacific Railroad v. United States

Union Pacific Railroad v. United States
Court of Claims · Decided January 13, 1953
124 Ct. Cl. 291

Counsel

Mr. Raymond A. Negus for plaintiffs. Mr. Lawrence Cake was on the briefs., Mr. S. R. Gamer, with whom was Mr. Assistant Attorney General Holmes Baldridge, for defendant. Mr. Frank J. Keating was on the briefs.

Union Pacific Railroad v. United States

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

The pleadings and the issue in these cases are the same as in Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company v. United States, 121 C. Cls. 467. For the reasons therein set forth plaintiffs’ motions for summary judgment, to the extent that they ask for an adjudication that the jeeps involved in this action should be classified and rated as passenger motor vehicles, are granted.

Entry of judgment is suspended pending the filing of a report by the General Accounting Office and the disposition of the issues relating to the proper amount to be paid to plaintiff for the transportation services involved.

It is so ordered.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.