Tufano Contracting Corp. v. United States
Cases that cite this one
9 later published cases cite this decision.
- Gus Kraus, Doing Business as Condor Machine Works v. The United States (Court of Claims 1966)
- United International Investigative Services v. United States (United States Court of Federal Claims 1995)
- James A. Mann, Inc. v. United States (Court of Claims 1976)
- Kenneth Reed Construction Corp. v. United States (Court of Claims 1973)
- Chris Berg, Inc. v. United States (Court of Claims 1972)
- J. W. Bateson Co. v. United States (Court of Claims 1971)
- Air-A-Plane Corporation v. The United States (Court of Claims 1969)
- J. A. Jones Construction Company v. The United States (Court of Claims 1968)
- W. G. Cornell Company of Washington, D. C., Inc. v. The United States (Court of Claims 1967)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
In an opinion dated February 18, 1966 (174 Ct. Cl. 398, 356 F. 2d 535), the court held that plaintiffs were entitled to recover on certain claims respecting their Capehart Housing Act contract to construct for the Air Force a 220-unit housing project at Suffolk County Air Force Base, New York, and returned the case to the Trial Commissioner to determine the amount of recovery. On December 30, 1969, Commissioner Mastin G. White filed a printed report, containing an opinion, findings of fact, and recommended conclusion of law relative to the amount of plaintiffs’ recovery; on March 30, 1970, Commissioner White filed a memorandum report recommending that, in accordance with the opinion of the court and the stipulation of the parties, judgment be entered for plaintiffs in the sum of $166,347, which recommendation is adopted by the court. On April 3, 1970, the court entered judgment for plaintiffs in said amount.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.