Swaaley v. United States
Cases that cite this one
33 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.
- Paul W. Burkett v. United States (Court of Claims 1968)
- Francis M. Fiorillo v. U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Prisons (Fed. Cir. 1986)
- Jane Doe v. Robert E. Hampton, Individually and as Chairman, U. S. Civil Service Commission (D.C. Cir. 1977)
- Anita J. Ring v. Honorable James R. Schlesinger and Honorable John W. Warner (D.C. Cir. 1974)
- Jackson (Court of Claims 1972)
- Matsuo v. United States (United States District Court for the District of Hawaii 2006)
- Overview Books, LLC v. United States (United States Court of Federal Claims 2006)
- Hassler v. United States (United States Court of Federal Claims 1996)
- Cameron v. United States (United States Court of Federal Claims 1995)
- Louise J. Hamlet v. The United States (Fed. Cir. 1989)
- Walker v. United States (Court of Claims 1986)
- Mavis Day v. South Park Independent School District (5th Cir. 1985)
- Halliday v. United States (Court of Claims 1985)
- Rosano v. United States (Court of Claims 1985)
- ATL, Inc. v. United States (Court of Claims 1984)
- Kennedy v. United States (Court of Claims 1984)
- Mustin v. Hayes (United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama 1984)
- The United States v. Patrick J. Connolly (Fed. Cir. 1983)
- Related Industries, Inc. v. United States (Court of Claims 1983)
- Hilchey v. United States (Court of Claims 1982)
- Brousseau v. United States (Court of Claims 1981)
- Candace M. Hanson v. F. Nordy Hoffmann, Sergeant at Arms, His Agents, Predecessors and Successors, United States Senate (D.C. Cir. 1980)
- Wise v. United States (Court of Claims 1979)
- Crain v. Krehbiel (United States District Court for the Northern District of California 1978)
- Featheringill v. United States (Court of Claims 1978)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
On December 11, 1967, the court ordered that plaintiff is entitled to recover the gross amount of $30,598 less $22,169.03 representing outside earnings of plaintiff, and that judgment be entered for plaintiff for tbe difference between the two figures amounting to $8,428.97, from which the following deductions were to be made: $1,988.96 to be credited to plaintiff’s Civil Service Retirement Fund account, $215.25 to be credited to plaintiff’s Federal Employee’s Group Life Insurance, and $675.24 representing the lump sum leave payments made to plaintiff at the time of his separation, tbe balance of $5,549.52 to be paid to plaintiff.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.