Clark
Cases that cite this one
14 later published cases cite this decision.
- Hill v. United States (Fed. Cir. 2006)
- McCauley v. States (United States Court of Federal Claims 1997)
- Johnny Granado, Jr. v. Department of Justice (Fed. Cir. 1983)
- Young v. United States (United States Court of Federal Claims 2009)
- Taylor v. United States (United States Court of Federal Claims 2008)
- Dixon v. United States (Court of Claims 1989)
- Montalvo v. United States (Court of Claims 1989)
- Richardson v. Department of Justice, Bureau of Prisons (Court of Claims 1982)
- Hadley v. Department of the Navy (Court of Claims 1981)
- Elkins v. United States (Court of Claims 1981)
- Winters (Court of Claims 1980)
- Mack v. United States (Court of Claims 1980)
- Yates (Court of Claims 1979)
- Prillman (Court of Claims 1979)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
“Plaintiff, a retired GS-5 employee of the United States Coast Guard, alleges that as a result of certain racially discriminatory actions on the part of the Department of Transportation he was denied promotions and, after he instituted complaint, purposely transferred and promoted into a jo'b he was physically unable to perform. Plaintiff seeks back pay for various periods beginning in 1961 and reinstatement in a GS-9 position.
“Plaintiff’s claim for back pay for positions to which he was never promoted is based upon alleged racial discrimination against him during his employment. The court concludes that in view of the decisions of the Supreme Court in United States v. Testan, 424 U.S. 392 (1976), and Brown v. General Services Administration, 425 U.S. 820 (1976), it is without jurisdiction to consider claims for promotion based on racial discrimination. Allison v. United States, 211 Ct. Cl. 332 (1976); Morton v. United States, ante at 549. It is clear from the decision in Brown, supra, that any jurisdiction this court may have had over back pay claims based on racial discrimination has been divested by the Equal Employment Opportunity Act of 1972. We are not unmindful of the fact that
“it is ordered that defendant’s motion for summary judgment be and is hereby granted and that the petition be and is hereby dismissed.”
Plaintiff’s petition for ceriorari was denied October 3, 1977.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.