Wolfe
Opinion of the Court
Court of Claims jurisdiction; claim for expert witness fee. — On March 7, 1980 the court entered the following order:
This action is before the court, without oral argument, on cross-motions for summary judgment. The action is a claim for an expert witness fee of $500 and for expenses of $6. The fee and expenses relate to services allegedly rendered by plaintiff for defendant. Having reviewed carefully the record, we grant defendant’s motion for summary judgment.
Plaintiff alleges that he rendered services for defendant in the capacity of an expert on religion when, as the "head”
The IRS summoned plaintiff to testify at the hearing, not to benefit from his expertise on religion, but to obtain from him facts relevant to the tax status of the Church. The IRS was authorized by statute
Plaintiffs claim is not based on the Constitution, a statute, a regulation, or a contract, express or implied. Thus, under 28 U.S.C. § 1491 (1976), we lack jurisdiction over the claim.
it is therefore ordered that defendant’s motion for summary judgment is granted, plaintiffs cross-motion is denied, and the petition in this case is dismissed.
I.R.C. §§ 7602,7605(c).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.