Taylor
Opinion of the Court
Civilian pay; security guards, overtime compensation incident to shift change requirements, and to performance of functions integral and essential to principal functions; Federal Employees Pay Act of 1945; induced overtime, equivalent to officially ordered or approved overtime within meaning of the Act; amount of compensable overtime cognizable; consideration of the de minimis doctrine.— Plaintiffs, employed as members of the civilian security guard force at the Anniston Army Depot in Alabama, seek overtime compensation under the Federal Employees Pay Act of 1945 for the period from March 22, 1970 to the date of trial. Plaintiffs contend they were induced by their supervisors to report to work prior to the start of their official shifts in order to relieve the shifts already on duty in time for the latter to report off work as scheduled. The additional time was necessary to accomplish the regular duties assigned to the plaintiffs by their supervisors, e.g., drawing weapons and equipment, briefings, and travel to outlying guard posts. The plaintiffs were not compensated for this additional time. Oral complaints by the guards were met with the suggestion that they could resign if they failed to go along. The pressure of the peer group, namely, other guards waiting to be relieved, was also used by the supervisors to induce early arrival. The guards filed a formal complaint in 1974. On January 11, 1975, the
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.