Quillin v. United States
Cases that cite this one
11 later published cases cite this decision. The 10 that cite it most often are listed here.
- Bernard v. United States (United States Court of Federal Claims 2004)
- Benavides v. United States (Fed. Cir. 2026)
- Greene v. United States (United States Court of Federal Claims 2023)
- Greene v. United States (United States Court of Federal Claims 2023)
- Baqleh v. United States (United States Court of Federal Claims 2023)
- Kaetz v. United States (United States Court of Federal Claims 2022)
- Abdel-Malak v. United States (United States Court of Federal Claims 2021)
- Turner v. United States (United States Court of Federal Claims 2019)
- Samuel J. Burleson v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice (Tex. App. 2018)
- Jackson v. United States (Fed. Cir. 2015)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
This case is before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss. The issue presented is whether plaintiffs complaint has set forth any claim upon which relief can be granted. For the reasons discussed herein, we dismiss plaintiffs petition.
Plaintiff "Copyright” John A. Quillin, Jr. "1949” filed this petition on February 24, 1981, alleging false imprisonment and copyright infringement. From the papers submitted, it appears plaintiff believes he has copyrighted his name and claims some sort of false imprisonment by various government officials who have infringed his copyright. Plaintiff cites to the thirteenth amendment of the Constitution, the United Nations Declaration on Human Rights, and a Deed of Manumissions from 1863.
This is an unfortunate petition where plaintiff evidently has some grievance — be it real or imaginary — but has not presented any claim to this court on which relief can be granted. Any claim of false imprisonment sounds in tort and is beyond this court’s jurisdiction. E.g., Somali Develop
Therefore, defendant’s motion to dismiss is granted and plaintiffs petition is dismissed.
Plaintiffs motion for rehearing was denied October 2, 1981.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.