Skip to the main content
Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /United States /Cases /Court of Customs and Patent Appeals /

1919

70 Court of Customs and Patent Appeals opinions from 1919.

  • Connor v. United States 9 Ct. Cust. 312, (1919)
  • Fougera & Co. v. United States 9 Ct. Cust. 296, (1919)
  • Aetna Explosives Co. v. United States 9 Ct. Cust. 298, (1919)
  • Tower & Sons v. United States 9 Ct. Cust. 307, (1919)
  • United States v. Lehn & Fink 9 Ct. Cust. 309, (1919)
  • Fougera & Co. v. United States 9 Ct. Cust. 284, (1919)
  • United States v. Billin & Co. 9 Ct. Cust. 286, (1919)
  • Simiansky & Co. v. United States 9 Ct. Cust. 288, (1919)
  • Vantine & Co. v. United States 9 Ct. Cust. 291, (1919)
  • United States v. Massce & Co. 9 Ct. Cust. 256, (1919)
  • United States v. Johnson Co. 9 Ct. Cust. 258, (1919)
  • Poole Co. v. United States 9 Ct. Cust. 271, (1919)
  • Lloyd Co. v. United States 9 Ct. Cust. 280, (1919)
  • United States v. Coroneos Bros. 9 Ct. Cust. 220, (1919)
  • United States v. Thomsen & Co. 9 Ct. Cust. 223, (1919)
  • Minneapolis Cold Storage Co. v. United States 9 Ct. Cust. 225, (1919)
  • United States v. Golden Co. 9 Ct. Cust. 229, (1919)
  • United States v. Mutual China Co. 9 Ct. Cust. 232, (1919)
  • Ross & Co. v. United States 9 Ct. Cust. 235, (1919)
  • United States v. Kuttroff, Pickhardt & Co. 9 Ct. Cust. 239, (1919)
  • United States v. Amerman & Patterson 9 Ct. Cust. 244, (1919)
  • United States v. Murphy & Co. 9 Ct. Cust. 248, (1919)
  • United States v. National Gum & Mica Co. 9 Ct. Cust. 250, (1919)
  • United States v. Mallinckrodt Chemical Works 9 Ct. Cust. 252, (1919)
  • United States v. Coastwise Steamship & Barge Co. 9 Ct. Cust. 216, (1919)
  • United States v. American Bead Co. 9 Ct. Cust. 193, (1919)
  • Littlejohn & Co. v. United States 9 Ct. Cust. 207, (1919)
  • American Colortype Co. v. United States 9 Ct. Cust. 212, (1919)
  • United States v. Willenborg & Co. 9 Ct. Cust. 187, (1919)
  • United States v. Koscherak Bros. 9 Ct. Cust. 190, (1919)
  • United States v. Maine Central Railway Co. 9 Ct. Cust. 192, (1919)
  • United States v. Shallus & Co. 9 Ct. Cust. 168, (1919)
  • Cochran Co. v. United States 9 Ct. Cust. 172, (1919)
  • Durbrow & Hearne Manufacturing Co. v. United States 9 Ct. Cust. 177, (1919)
  • United States v. Battiloro 9 Ct. Cust. 180, (1919)
  • United States v. Bartiromo 9 Ct. Cust. 183, (1919)
  • Maderia Embroidery Co. v. United States 9 Ct. Cust. 140, (1919)
  • United States v. International Forwarding Co. 9 Ct. Cust. 144, (1919)
  • United States v. Brown & Co. 9 Ct. Cust. 146, (1919)
  • Durbrow & Hearne Manufacturing Co. v. United States 9 Ct. Cust. 148, (1919)
  • United States v. Sheldon & Co. 9 Ct. Cust. 153, (1919)
  • United States v. International Forwarding Co. 9 Ct. Cust. 156, (1919)
  • United States v. Bush & Co. 9 Ct. Cust. 160, (1919)
  • Donat & Co. v. United States 9 Ct. Cust. 162, (1919)
  • United States v. Rice Co. 9 Ct. Cust. 165, (1919)
  • United States v. Baxter 9 Ct. Cust. 99, (1919)
  • Yuen & Co. v. United States 9 Ct. Cust. 108, (1919)
  • United States v. Lee & Co. 9 Ct. Cust. 111, (1919)
  • Vandegrift & Co. v. United States 9 Ct. Cust. 112, (1919)
  • Drakenfeld & Co. v. United States 9 Ct. Cust. 124, (1919)
« Prev 1 2 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑