Skip to the main content
Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /United States /Cases /Court of Customs and Patent Appeals /

1939

213 Court of Customs and Patent Appeals opinions from 1939.

  • International Graphite & Electrode Corp. v. United States 27 C.C.P.A. 36, (1939)
  • Ropa Co. v. United States 27 C.C.P.A. 42, (1939)
  • Lamborn & Co. v. United States 104 F.2d 75, (1939)
  • Neumann-Endler, Inc. v. United States 27 C.C.P.A. 53, (1939)
  • Ueland v. United States 27 C.C.P.A. 56, (1939)
  • Dirkes v. Eitzen 103 F.2d 520, (1939)
  • Leichsenring v. Feeeman 103 F.2d 378, (1939)
  • In re Thornbery 103 F.2d 387, (1939)
  • Schmitz v. Silver 103 F.2d 390, (1939)
  • In re Klemm 103 F.2d 373, (1939)
  • Dever 103 F.2d 376, (1939)
  • In re Jones 103 F.2d 733, (1939)
  • Corn Products Refining Co. v. Coca-Cola Co. 103 F.2d 385, (1939)
  • Walsh v. Schultz 103 F.2d 392, (1939)
  • In re Hendricks 103 F.2d 383, (1939)
  • Brock v. Wittmann 103 F.2d 408, (1939)
  • In re Wagner 103 F.2d 414, (1939)
  • Pepsodent Co. v. Pepsinic Seltzer Co. 103 F.2d 362, (1939)
  • Riemenschneider v. Matthaei 103 F.2d 366, (1939)
  • Stenger v. Holmes 103 F.2d 410, (1939)
  • United States v. Carl Zeiss, Inc. 27 C.C.P.A. 12, (1939)
  • Balfour, Guthrie & Co. v. United States 27 C.C.P.A. 17, (1939)
  • United States v. International Forwarding Co. 27 C.C.P.A. 21, (1939)
  • Kelly Liquor Co. v. National Brokerage Co. 102 F.2d 857, (1939)
  • In re Mitchel 102 F.2d 868, (1939)
  • In re Rolph 102 F.2d 875, (1939)
  • In re Rolph 102 F.2d 873, (1939)
  • In re Kohler 102 F.2d 821, (1939)
  • In re Walter 102 F.2d 855, (1939)
  • In re Atkinson 102 F.2d 882, (1939)
  • Goldberg v. Thornhill 102 F.2d 896, (1939)
  • In re Gillis 102 F.2d 902, (1939)
  • Central Iron & Steel Co. v. Republic Steel Corp. 102 F.2d 899, (1939)
  • Borm v. Champayne 102 F.2d 862, (1939)
  • Bray v. Tears 102 F.2d 877, (1939)
  • In re Bostwick 102 F.2d 886, (1939)
  • In re Bostwick 102 F.2d 889, (1939)
  • Fernandez v. Gillman 102 F.2d 891, (1939)
  • Fernandez v. Hill 102 F.2d 894, (1939)
  • In re Madge 102 F.2d 853, (1939)
  • In re Schwendt 102 F.2d 851, (1939)
  • In re Bailey Meter Co. 102 F.2d 843, (1939)
  • In re Hoover 102 F.2d 849, (1939)
  • Henry Pels & Co. v. United States 27 C.C.P.A. 1, (1939)
  • Otis McAllister & Co. v. United States 27 C.C.P.A. 4, (1939)
  • F. F. G. Harper & Co. v. United States 27 C.C.P.A. 9, (1939)
  • Jenkins Petroleum Process Co. v. Herthel 102 F.2d 965, (1939)
  • David L. Moss Co. v. United States 103 F.2d 395, (1939)
  • Noxon v. Potts 102 F.2d 836, (1939)
  • In re Austin 102 F.2d 834, (1939)
« Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑