U.S. Circuit Court for the District of North Carolina, 1793

Taylor v. Tolwin

Taylor v. Tolwin
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of North Carolina · Decided July 1, 1793 · Doderidge, Hitcham, Serj, Whitlock
1 N.C. 194
Taylor v. Tolwin

Opinion of the Court

Doderidge, J. and Whitlock, J.

concurred. The statute 21 Jac. c. 13. p. 372. does not help this, for it aids only where the venire facias is of one place, where it should be of both, or e converso. But here is no place from which the venire is to be.

Doderidge, J. The statutes of Jeoffails have always been construed literally.

Adjournatur, the other Judges being absent.

And afterwards the court being full, was of the same opinion.

Hitcham, Serj.

prayed and obtained a repleader: for there could be no new trial. But if there had been an issue made, and a miss-trial, they would have awarded a new venire, and not a repleader. Godb. 469. 382. Bayneham's case. 5 Coke 36.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.