United States v. Mickle

said they had decided, in Ismenard’s Case [Case No. 15,450], on the same indictment, that the distribution of spirituous liquors at the gaming-table, without receiving payment specifically therefor, was not a retailing of spirituous liquors within the meaning of the act.

Mr. Jones, for United States, gave up the 2d count.

Verdict, “Guilty on the 1st count”