Richardson v. Peyton
Richardson v. Peyton
20 F. Cas. 725; 1 Cranch 418
Opinion of the Court
refused to hear Mr. Swann in reply, and said the point had been often decided, that if a contract be not complied with on oné part, and the other party had paid his money, he may disaffirm the contract, and i-ecover back his money in an action for money had and received.
Verdict for the plaintiff. The defendant took a bill of exceptions, but did not bring a writ of error.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.