U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia, 1812

Miller's Administrator v. Young

Miller's Administrator v. Young
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia · Decided July 15, 1812 · Thruston
2 D.C. 53; 17 F. Cas. 365; 2 Cranch 53
Miller's Administrator v. Young

Opinion of the Court

The Court,

however,

(Thruston, J., absent,)

had made up their opinion, that the statute against pretensed titles did not vacate the deed; and that the agreement to settle the account, being executed by a deed with general warranty, which was accepted by the plaintiff, the transaction was closed and could not be disaffirmed; and that the plaintiff must resort to his warranty..

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.