Contee v. Garner
Contee v. Garner
2 D.C. 162; 6 F. Cas. 361; 2 Cranch 162
Opinion of the Court
was inclined to think that it ought to have concluded with a verification.
The Court also decided that a slave cannot bind himself, at law, to pay money to his master, even for his freedom.
By consent, the plea was amended, the demurrer withdrawn, and issue joined upon the replication to the plea. Upón the trial, the plaintiff was non-prossed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.